Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570308›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Household reduction of gas consumption in the energy crisis is not explained by individual economic incentives.

Markus Dertwinkel-Kalt, Christoph Feldhaus, Axel Ockenfels, Matthias Sutter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Household reduction of gas consumption in the energy crisis is not explained by individual economic incentives.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Markus Dertwinkel-KaltSchool of Business and Economics, University of Münster, Münster 48149, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2565-6597
Christoph FeldhausFaculty of Management and Economics, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum 44801, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0342-1500
Axel OckenfelsExperimental Economics Group, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods Bonn, Bonn 53113, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1456-0191
Matthias SutterExperimental Economics Group, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods Bonn, Bonn 53113, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6143-8706

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) EXC 2126/1- 390838866Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) FOR 5392 - 462020252
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the disruption of gas supplies from Russia following the invasion of Ukraine in 2022, European politicians and public utilities appealed to citizens and customers to conserve natural gas. Moreover, they strengthened economic incentives for gas conservation. In fact, a substantial amount of natural gas was saved during the winter of 2022/23. This raises the question to what extent this success is attributable to government and corporate means to foster energy conservation in the crisis, including energy policies such as the German government's "gas price brake," gas-saving programs launched by public utilities, and consumers' individual pricing schemes. We analyzed the effectiveness of these means using a survey and a field experiment with a German gas supplier and show that, while household savings during the crisis were substantial, economic incentives did not significantly change behavior. Indeed, demand for gas is largely price inelastic. A large majority of consumers do not understand the incentives arising from the gas price brake, and when they do, they do not respond. Likewise, consumers do not react to the design of the utilities' gas-saving program. These findings suggest that i) citizens' response to marginal individual economic incentives contributes little to overall gas savings, and ii) the crisis, along with the extensive societal engagement it generated, likely shifted the public's mindset about energy consumption, making conservation a social priority.

Indexed as

energy crisisenergy policygas price brake

Identifiers

PMID39570308
PMCPMC11621823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.