SynthesisAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2025
A case report and systematic review of periorbital emphysema following nose blowing or sneezing.
Synthesis in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Periorbital emphysema following nose blowing or sneezing is rare. Although it is often self-limiting, air trapping in the orbit can raise the intraocular pressure leading to visual complications. At present, the literature on this topic is confined to case reports. In this article, we present a rare case of periorbital emphysema following nose blowing in a 34-year-old woman and a subsequent systematic review that included 43 case reports of periorbital emphysema following similar mechanisms. Orbital wall fracture was seen in 70% and a defect in the lamina papyracea is the most common finding on computed tomography imaging. Surgical intervention was performed in 30% of patients; indications included visual compromise, paranasal osteoma and inflammatory disease. Most patients can be safely discharged on the same day with oral antibiotics unless there are clinical signs of visual compromise or sinonasal mass that may necessitate surgical intervention. The recurrence rate is low (3%) and almost all will resolve within 4 weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.