Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570146›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental immunology2025

Past, present, and future of Phase 3 vaccine trial design: rethinking statistics for the 21st century.

Leila Janani, Rachel Phillips, Ellie Van Vogt, Xinxue Liu, Claire Waddington, Suzie Cro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leila JananiImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3829-6364
Rachel PhillipsImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ellie Van VogtImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Xinxue LiuOxford Vaccine Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Claire WaddingtonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Suzie CroImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6113-1173

Funding

NIHR Development and Skills Enhancement Award NIHR304121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines are crucial for protecting health globally; however, their widespread use relies on rigorous clinical development programmes. This includes Phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to confirm their safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy. Traditionally, such trials used fixed designs with predetermined assumptions, lacking the flexibility to change during the trial or stop early due to overwhelming evidence of either efficacy or futility. Modern vaccine trials benefit from innovative approaches like adaptive designs, allowing for planned trial adaptations based on accumulating data. Here, we provide an overview of the evolution of Phase 3 vaccine trial design and statistical analysis methods from traditional to more innovative contemporary methods. This includes adaptive trial designs, which offer ethical advantages and enable early termination if indicated; Bayesian methods, which combine prior knowledge and observed trial data to increase efficiency and enhance result interpretation; modern statistical analysis methods, which enable more accurate and precise inferences; the estimand framework, which ensures the primary question of interest is addressed in a trial; novel approaches using machine learning methods to assess heterogeneity of treatment effects; and statistical advances in safety analysis to evaluate reactogenicity and clinical adverse events. We conclude with insights into the future direction of vaccine trials, aiming to inform clinicians and researchers about conventional and novel RCT design and analysis approaches to facilitate the conduct of efficient, timely trials.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase III as TopicResearch DesignVaccinesBayes TheoremData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVaccinesadaptive designsestimandPhase 3randomized clinical trialsvaccine

Identifiers

PMID39570146
PMCPMC11754867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.