ArticleNorth Carolina medical journal2024
Examining the Completeness of Industry and Occupation Data Among Patients Newly Diagnosed with Cancer in North Carolina.
Article in North Carolina medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility of acquiring occupational data from cancer patients' medical records in Malaysian oncology centres.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Occupational exposure to toxic substances has been associated with cancer. Including industry and occupation (I/O) in cancer surveillance can help identify potential links between occupational exposures and cancers using data already collected to monitor statewide cancer trends. I/O reporting is required in cancer registries and recently in death records. In this study, we examined the completeness of I/O information in North Carolina cancer and death certificate data. Methods: The North Carolina Central Cancer Registry (NC CCR) is the sole repository of North Carolina cancer incidence data. NC CCR (2020-2021) and death certificate data (2020-2022) were analyzed for completeness of I/O. NC CCR incidence records for 1995-2021 diagnoses were linked to North Carolina death files (2020-2022). Results: NC CCR data had I/O in 17% to 51% of the cases, depending on cancer type. I/O was included in 41% of 2020 death certificates and increased to a 99.9% inclusion in 2021 and 2022 death certificates. In 2020, 20,018 (18%) of 109,677 total deaths matched with a cancer record during NC CCR data linkage. In 2021, 20,225 (16%) of 119,237 total deaths matched with a cancer record, and in 2022, 20,367 (17%) of 116,406 total deaths matched to a cancer record. Limitations: Data presented here only examine the completeness of 10 cancer types that the NC CCR regularly analyzes using the most recent data available (2021). Conclusion: Health care providers should routinely record I/O using the standards explained in the training for providers on I/O data collection, provided by the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, and should increase their frequency of reporting I/O to NC CCR. Death certificate data may provide I/O data for individuals whose information is missing from cancer registry data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.