ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2024
Non-iterative model-based inversion for low channel-count optical ultrasound imaginga).
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Holographic diffusers for endoluminal-scale optical ultrasound imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound image reconstruction is typically performed using the computationally efficient delay-and-sum algorithm. However, this algorithm is suboptimal for systems of low channel counts, where it causes significant image artefacts. These artefacts can be suppressed through model-based inversion approaches; however, their computational costs typically prohibit real-time implementations. In this work, the emerging optical ultrasound (OpUS) modality is considered, where ultrasound waves are both generated and detected using light. With this modality, imaging probes comprise very low channel counts, resulting in significant image artefacts that limit the imaging dynamic range. However, this low channel counts offer an opportunity for non-iterative ("direct") model-based inversion (DMI) on modest computational resources available in a typical workstation. When applied to both synthetic and experimental OpUS data, the presented DMI method achieved substantial reduction in image artefacts and noise, improved recovery of image amplitudes, and-after one-off pre-computation of the system matrices-significantly reduced reconstruction time, even in imaging scenarios exhibiting mild spatial inhomogeneity. Whilst here applied to an OpUS imaging system, DMI can be applied to other low channel-count imaging systems, and is therefore expected to achieve better image quality, reduce system complexity, or both, in a wide range of settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.