ArticleSICOT-J2024
Artificial intelligence in planned orthopaedic care.
Article in SICOT-J, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Current Evidence and Clinical Translation Across the Patient Care Pathway.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Robotic-assisted and AI-augmented arthroplasty: converging technologies in joint replacement.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Accuracy of Diagnosis and Anticipation of Future Treatment in Pediatric Peripelvic Infections: The Role of Multisurgeon Review and Implications for Future Machine Learning Algorithms.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026Article
- Blood transfusion in total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty: A nationwide study of complications, costs and predictive modelling.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Sensor-integrated hip and knee prostheses: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into orthopaedic care has gained considerable interest in recent years, evidenced by the growing body of literature boasting wide-ranging applications across the perioperative setting. This includes automated diagnostic imaging, clinical decision-making tools, optimisation of implant design, robotic surgery, and remote patient monitoring. Collectively, these advances propose to enhance patient care and improve system efficiency. Musculoskeletal pathologies represent the most significant contributor to global disability, with roughly 1.71 billion people afflicted, leading to an increasing volume of patients awaiting planned orthopaedic surgeries. This has exerted a considerable strain on healthcare systems globally, compounded by both the COVID-19 pandemic and the effects of an ageing population. Subsequently, patients face prolonged waiting times for surgery, with further deterioration and potentially poorer outcomes as a result. Furthermore, incorporating AI technologies into clinical practice could provide a means of addressing current and future service demands. This review aims to present a clear overview of AI applications across preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative stages to elucidate its potential to transform planned orthopaedic care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.