Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39570018›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgery2025

Decoding Glioblastoma Heterogeneity: Neuroimaging Meets Machine Learning.

Jawad Fares, Yizhou Wan, Roxanne Mayrand, Yonghao Li, Richard Mair, Stephen J Price

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jawad FaresDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Academic Neurosurgery Division, University of Cambridge, Cambridge , UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5368-8764
Yizhou WanDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Academic Neurosurgery Division, University of Cambridge, Cambridge , UK.
Roxanne MayrandDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Academic Neurosurgery Division, University of Cambridge, Cambridge , UK.
Yonghao LiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Academic Neurosurgery Division, University of Cambridge, Cambridge , UK.
Richard MairDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Academic Neurosurgery Division, University of Cambridge, Cambridge , UK.
Stephen J PriceDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Academic Neurosurgery Division, University of Cambridge, Cambridge , UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancements in neuroimaging and machine learning have significantly improved our ability to diagnose and categorize isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma, a disease characterized by notable tumoral heterogeneity, which is crucial for effective treatment. Neuroimaging techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance radiomics, provide noninvasive insights into tumor infiltration patterns and metabolic profiles, aiding in accurate diagnosis and prognostication. Machine learning algorithms further enhance glioblastoma characterization by identifying distinct imaging patterns and features, facilitating precise diagnoses and treatment planning. Integration of these technologies allows for the development of image-based biomarkers, potentially reducing the need for invasive biopsy procedures and enabling personalized therapy targeting specific pro-tumoral signaling pathways and resistance mechanisms. Although significant progress has been made, ongoing innovation is essential to address remaining challenges and further improve these methodologies. Future directions should focus on refining machine learning models, integrating emerging imaging techniques, and elucidating the complex interplay between imaging features and underlying molecular processes. This review highlights the pivotal role of neuroimaging and machine learning in glioblastoma research, offering invaluable noninvasive tools for diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and treatment planning, ultimately improving patient outcomes. These advances in the field promise to usher in a new era in the understanding and classification of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaMachine LearningNeuroimagingHumansArtificial intelligenceDiffusion tensor imagingIDH-wildtype glioblastomaMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID39570018
PMCPMC12052239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.