ReviewNeurosurgery2025
Decoding Glioblastoma Heterogeneity: Neuroimaging Meets Machine Learning.
Review in Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial and Volumetric Characteristics of Glioblastoma: Associations With Clinical Presentation and Survival.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Unsupervised anomaly detection for tumor delineation in a preclinical model of glioblastoma using CEST MRI.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A spatiotemporal state-inference framework for adaptive immunotherapy in glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Functional, Structural, and AI-Based MRI Analysis: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Personalized chronotherapy in glioblastoma: integrating circadian profiling and PK-PD modelling to optimize temozolomide timing.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- RANO 2.0: critical updates and practical considerations for radiological assessment in neuro-oncology.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Machine learning and deep learning in glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Spatial invasion patterns of temporal lobe glioblastoma after complete resection of contrast-enhancing tumor.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Nontargeted metabolomics uncovering metabolite signatures in glioblastoma: a preliminary study on candidate biomarker discovery for IDH subtyping and survival prediction.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in neuroimaging and machine learning have significantly improved our ability to diagnose and categorize isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma, a disease characterized by notable tumoral heterogeneity, which is crucial for effective treatment. Neuroimaging techniques, such as diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance radiomics, provide noninvasive insights into tumor infiltration patterns and metabolic profiles, aiding in accurate diagnosis and prognostication. Machine learning algorithms further enhance glioblastoma characterization by identifying distinct imaging patterns and features, facilitating precise diagnoses and treatment planning. Integration of these technologies allows for the development of image-based biomarkers, potentially reducing the need for invasive biopsy procedures and enabling personalized therapy targeting specific pro-tumoral signaling pathways and resistance mechanisms. Although significant progress has been made, ongoing innovation is essential to address remaining challenges and further improve these methodologies. Future directions should focus on refining machine learning models, integrating emerging imaging techniques, and elucidating the complex interplay between imaging features and underlying molecular processes. This review highlights the pivotal role of neuroimaging and machine learning in glioblastoma research, offering invaluable noninvasive tools for diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and treatment planning, ultimately improving patient outcomes. These advances in the field promise to usher in a new era in the understanding and classification of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.