Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39569913›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2024

How Technical Advances Changed the Concept of Antibodies.

Bartlomiej Swiatczak, Gregor P Greslehner, Martin Zach

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bartlomiej SwiatczakDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6767-3064
Gregor P GreslehnerDepartment of Philosophy, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4072-8229
Martin ZachInstitute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7181-0391

Funding

Austrian Science Fund 10.55776/COE3Grantová Agentura České Republiky 24-11861S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shaped by advances in scientific instrumentation and experimental techniques, the concept of antibody has undergone profound transformations throughout the history of immunology. Serological assays, separation techniques, protein fragmentation techniques, molecular biology techniques, and other methodological innovations did not only serve to produce data on the structure and function of these molecules but, by framing antibodies into a unique facet of experimental investigation, were effectively redefining and reconceptualizing these molecules for the scientific community. The characteristics and properties of antibodies observed in experimental settings were often directly extrapolated to their presumed nature in living organisms, as exemplified by the literal identification of antibodies with a gamma electrophoretic fraction in the 1930s. Stemming from parallel advances in related fields such as molecular biology and biochemistry, the introduction of novel techniques was driving shifts in the field of immunology, establishing novel frameworks of theoretical conceptualization and understanding. Technological innovation in experimental techniques continues to shape our view of these molecules, driving progress in both basic immunology and therapeutic applications.

Indexed as

AntibodiesAllergy and ImmunologyAnimalsHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansAntibodiesantibodiesconceptual changehistory of sciencephilosophy of sciencescientific instrumentstechnology

Identifiers

PMID39569913
PMCPMC13459525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.