Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39569907›Full record

Observational studyJournal of advanced nursing2025

Resilience and the Dynamics of Job Demands: A Diary Study on Interactions in Healthcare Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Greta Mazzetti, Mehmet Çetin, Dina Guglielmi, Silvia Simbula

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of advanced nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Greta MazzettiDepartment of Education Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2820-3315
Mehmet ÇetinDepartment of Leadership and Organization, Kristiania University College, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9773-9714
Dina GuglielmiDepartment of Education Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9482-7994
Silvia SimbulaDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9961-4920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIM(S): To explore the day-level interactions between challenge and hindrance job demands and their effects on work engagement and emotional exhaustion among healthcare professionals, focusing on the moderating role of resilience.

designA longitudinal, diary-based design was employed.

methodsThis study utilised a multilevel modelling approach to analyse 351 diary entries from 85 healthcare professionals, collected during the COVID-19 pandemic (in March-April 2021). Participants recorded their daily experiences, including job demands, work engagement, emotional exhaustion and resilience.

resultsChallenge demands, such as increased workload, are associated with both higher work engagement and greater emotional exhaustion, highlighting a dual impact. Resilience moderated these effects, reducing the negative impacts of both challenge and hindrance demands on emotional exhaustion. Surprisingly, higher resilience also diminished the positive relationship between effort and engagement.

conclusionThe study highlights the critical role of resilience in moderating the effects of job demands on healthcare workers' well-being, particularly under the stressful conditions of a global pandemic. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Insights from this study can assist healthcare organisations in developing strategies to enhance employee resilience and effectively manage job demands. Improved management of these factors can lead to better employee well-being and sustained engagement, ultimately benefiting patient care during high-stress periods. IMPACT: The study addressed the impact of daily job demands on the well-being and performance of healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main findings highlighted the dual effects of challenge demands and the protective role of resilience in mitigating the adverse effects of job demands. This research will impact healthcare organisations and policymakers, informing strategies to bolster workforce resilience and well-being, thereby potentially enhancing patient care during crises. REPORTING

methodWe adhered to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Neither patients nor the public were involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of our research. Healthcare professionals participated only as research subjects and did not engage in any aspect of the research process.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalCOVID-19Health PersonnelResilience, PsychologicalWorkloadAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Work EngagementburnoutCOVID‐19diaryengagementJD‐Rmultilevelnursingresilienceresourcestressor

Identifiers

PMID39569907
PMCPMC12271657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.