ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2025
Medical encounters with young unaccompanied refugees: a qualitative study among general practitioners and physicians in migrant health clinics in Norway and Denmark.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiences of everyday health support and healthcare among settled young people who arrived as unaccompanied refugees in Norway.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026Article
- Between Vulnerability and Deservingness: Social Imaginaries About Migrants Among Primary Health Care Nurses.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study examines the experiences of clinical encounters with young unaccompanied refugees in Norway and Denmark among both general practitioners (GPs) and physicians in migrant health clinics (MHC physicians), and it identifies important aspects that should be taken into consideration for improving the quality of healthcare for these patients. METHODOLOGY: Ten individual in-depth interviews with physicians in Norway and Denmark were conducted and analysed using interpretative phenomenology. Axel Honneth's theory of recognition was our theoretical lens.
resultsThe physicians described these patients as vulnerable individuals. They adopted a variety of approaches in their encounters with young unaccompanied refugees spanning from a 'holistic' to an 'instrumental' approach. Those who described an instrumental approach focused on understanding and categorising symptoms from a biomedical perspective, while those describing a holistic approach considered 'the whole person' within their everyday context. Those with a more holistic approach also expressed the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and defined work-divide. Relationships of trust between physicians and the young unaccompanied refugees were shown to be an important facilitator for adequate healthcare, but this required availability, continuity, and dialogue.
conclusionOur results highlight how physicians' encounters with vulnerable young refugees actualize previously documented contrasts between holistic and instrumental approaches in clinical work. We argue that recognition in healthcare is conditional on physicians taking a holistic approach. This approach can help build relationships of trust and can support interdisciplinary collaboration. Moreover, such an approach can facilitate the essential components of Honneth's theory of recognition, namely social esteem and emotional support. Barriers to greater interdisciplinary collaboration in healthcare services need to be addressed at the system level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.