Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39569840›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

The impact of tube voltage on the erosion of rotating x-ray anodes.

Rolf Behling, Christopher Hulme, Panagiotis Tolias, Mats Danielsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rolf BehlingParticle Physics, Astrophysics and Medical Imaging Department, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christopher HulmeDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Panagiotis ToliasDepartment of Space and Plasma Physics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mats DanielssonParticle Physics, Astrophysics and Medical Imaging Department, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe permitted input power density of rotating anode x-ray sources is limited by the performance of available target materials. The commonly used simplified formulas for the focal spot surface temperature ignore the tube voltage despite its variation in clinical practice. Improved modeling of electron transport and target erosion, as proposed in this work, improves the prediction of x-ray output degradation by target erosion, the absolute x-ray dose output and the quality of diagnostic imaging and orthovolt cancer therapy for a wide range of technique factors. PURPOSE: Improved modeling of electronic power absorption to include volume effects and surface erosion, to improve the understanding of x-ray output degradation, enhance the reliability of x-ray tubes, and safely widen their fields of use.

methodsWe combine Monte Carlo electron transport simulations, coupled thermoelasticity finite element modelling, erosion-induced surface granularity, and the temperature dependence of thermophysical and thermomechanical target properties. A semi-empirical thermomechanical criterion is proposed to predict the target erosion. We simulate the absorbed electronic power of an eroded tungsten-rhenium target, mimicked by a flat target topped with a monolayer of spheres, and compare with a pristine target.

resultsThe absorbed electronic power and with it the conversion efficiency varies with tube voltage and the state of erosion. With reference to 80 kV (100%), the absorption of a severely eroded relative to a pristine target is 105% (30 kV), 99% (100 kV), 97% (120 kV), 96% (150 kV), 93% (200 kV), 87% (250 kV), and 79% (300 kV). We show that, although the simplistic Müller-Oosterkamp model of surface heating underestimates the benefit of higher tube voltages relative to operation at 80 kV, the error is limited to below -6% for 30 kV (reduction advised) and +13% for 300 kV (input power increase permitted).

conclusionsCorrecting the x-ray conversion efficiency of eroded target material, that is typically not accessible by measuring the tube current, may imply corrections to existing x-ray dose calculations. The relative increase of the allowable anode input power of rotating anode x-ray tubes with increasing tube voltage is substantially smaller than predicted by volume heating models that only rely on the focal spot surface temperature. The widely used voltage agnostic Müller-Oosterkamp formalism fails to predict the tube voltage dependency of the surface temperature of rotating anode targets, ignores the temperature dependency of the thermal diffusivity of tungsten-rhenium, and the granularity of the material. Nevertheless, we show theoretically why, backed by experience, the practical use of the Müller-Oosterkamp formalism is justified in medical imaging and provides a basis for comparison with new microparticle based targets. The reason for this surprising finding is that voltage dependent material erosion must be primarily considered as a precursor of thermal runaway effects.

Indexed as

ElectrodesX-RaysMonte Carlo MethodRotationTemperatureheel effectmedical imagingnon‐destructive testingorthovolt cancer therapyrotating anodetarget crackingtarget erosionthermomechanical stresstungsten rheniumx‐ray output degradationx‐ray tube

Identifiers

PMID39569840
PMCPMC11788233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.