Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39569702›Full record

Trial reportHeadache2025

Safety and tolerability of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in participants taking atogepant for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: Results from the TANDEM study.

Jessica Ailani, Richard B Lipton, Andrew M Blumenfeld, Laszlo Mechtler, Brad C Klein, Molly Yizeng He, Jonathan H Smith, Joel M Trugman, Rosa de Abreu Ferreira, Elimor Brand-Schieber

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Headache, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Retrospective Review of Dual CGRP-Targeted Regimens for Acute and Preventive Treatment of Migraines in a Veteran Population.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Neuropeptidergic systems in psychiatric disorders.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jessica AilaniDepartment of Neurology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Richard B LiptonDepartment of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Andrew M BlumenfeldThe Los Angeles Headache Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Laszlo MechtlerDent Neurologic Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Brad C KleinAbington Neurological Associates, Abington, Pennsylvania, USA.
Molly Yizeng HeAbbVie, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-6353-8437
Jonathan H SmithAbbVie, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Joel M TrugmanAbbVie, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Rosa de Abreu FerreiraAbbVie, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Elimor Brand-SchieberAbbVie, North Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

AbbVie
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the safety and tolerability of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in participants taking atogepant for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine (EM).

backgroundAtogepant is an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist approved for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults and ubrogepant is an oral CGRP receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine in adults, with or without aura. The safety and tolerability of the concomitant use of ubrogepant and atogepant have not been previously evaluated in a clinical setting.

methodsThe TANDEM study, a phase 4, two-period, multicenter, open-label study conducted in the United States, enrolled adults with migraine, with or without aura, and <15 headache days/month. In Treatment Period 1, participants took atogepant 60 mg once daily (QD) for 12 weeks and their own non-gepant acute headache medication for breakthrough migraine attacks. In Treatment Period 2, participants continued taking atogepant 60 mg QD and ubrogepant 100 mg was taken as needed (PRN) for the treatment of breakthrough migraine attacks (up to eight per 4-week interval) for 12 weeks. In Treatment Period 2, an optional second ubrogepant dose or the participant's own acute medication could be used to rescue headaches that did not resolve within 2-24 h post initial ubrogepant dose. The primary objective evaluated the safety and tolerability of the concomitant use of ubrogepant and atogepant.

resultsOf 263 participants enrolled, 262 were treated in Treatment Period 1 (Safety Population 1) and 218 continued and were treated in Treatment Period 2 (Safety Population 2). The mean (standard deviation) number of ubrogepant use days in Treatment Period 2 was 6.6 (5.03) over the 12 weeks. In Treatment Periods 1 and 2, 49.6% and 43.1% of participants experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), respectively. The most common TEAEs (≥5%) in Treatment Period 1 and Treatment Period 2 were COVID-19 (8.4%, 3.2%), fatigue (6.5%, 1.4%), nausea (6.1%, 0.9%), decreased appetite (5.7%, 0.9%), and constipation (5.3%, 0.9%). In Treatment Period 2, no increase in the incidence and types of TEAEs in relation to the number of ubrogepant use days or doses taken were identified. During the whole treatment period, 9.9% of participants discontinued atogepant or ubrogepant treatment due to TEAEs. There was one serious TEAE in Treatment Period 1 (ureterolithiasis) and one in Treatment Period 2 (cervical myelopathy), and both were considered not related to study treatment by the study investigators.

conclusionThe use of atogepant 60 mg QD for the preventive treatment of EM and ubrogepant 100 mg PRN for the acute treatment of migraine over the 12-week open-label concomitant use treatment period was safe and well tolerated. The overall safety results were consistent with the known safety profiles of atogepant and ubrogepant when used alone and no new safety signals were identified.

Indexed as

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsMigraine DisordersPyridinesPyrrolesAdultDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsPyridinesPyrrolesubrogepantatogepantcalcitonin gene‐related peptidegepantsafetyubrogepant

Identifiers

PMID39569702
PMCPMC12129246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.