Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39569660›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2025

Intravenous Immunomodulatory Nanoparticles Prevent Secondary Damage after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Ryan Bertossi, Jonathan E Kurz, Tammy McGuire, Chian-Yu Peng, John A Kessler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Nanoparticle and epothilone D combinatorial intervention improves motor performance and regeneration in chronic cervical spinal cord injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ryan BertossiDavee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jonathan E KurzMerck & Co. One Merck Drive, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey, USA.
Tammy McGuireDavee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Chian-Yu PengDavee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3407-0894
John A KesslerDavee Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Immune-modifying nanoparticles for the treatment of traumatic brain injuryR01NS117476 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI KESSLER, JOHN A · 2020 to 2024
$2.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS117476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After traumatic brain injury (TBI), monocyte/macrophage infiltration is a key early step in the development of an inflammatory cascade that leads to substantial secondary damage. Intravenous (IV) immunomodulatory nanoparticle (IMP) administration after TBI limits inflammatory cell infiltration and reduces both behavioral decline and lesion size without any noticeable toxicity. Here we show that there is a dose-response relationship between the amount of IMP administered and tissue damage which plateaus at a well-tolerated dose. There is a therapeutic window of efficacy for IMP administration of at least 6 h after injury with some benefit observed when treatment was delayed for 12 h after injury. Single cell RNA sequencing demonstrated substantial changes in gene expression after TBI in both neural and non-neural cells in the brain, and IMP administration ameliorated many of the changes. Particularly notable were significant unexpected changes in CCR1, CXCR2, and BDNF expression in vascular smooth muscle cells that may participate in injury responses after TBI. Thus, IMP treatment within 6 h after TBI limits inflammatory responses and gliosis, improves anatomical and behavioral outcomes and prevents detrimental changes in gene expression in both neural and non-neural cellular elements of the brain. IMPs are non-toxic and are made of an FDA-approved material that is stable at room temperature. They could easily be given IV immediately after TBI in the field by emergency medical technicians or in the emergency room to prevent secondary damage, thereby improving outcomes.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticImmunologic FactorsNanoparticlesAdministration, IntravenousAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyImmunologic Factorschemokinesnanoparticlesneuroinflammationneuroprotectiontraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID39569660
PMCPMC11971540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.