ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2025
Intravenous Immunomodulatory Nanoparticles Prevent Secondary Damage after Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thiol-Based Neuroprotective Copolymers Acutely Restore Redox Metabolism and Mediate Vasogenic Edema in a Mouse Model of Traumatic Brain Injury.Macromolecular bioscience · 2026Article
- The Design Strategies and Applications of Engineered Nanoparticles for Traumatic Brain Injury.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Fate mapping of peripherally-derived macrophages after traumatic brain injury in mice reveals a long-lasting population with a distinct transcriptomic signature.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Nanoparticle and epothilone D combinatorial intervention improves motor performance and regeneration in chronic cervical spinal cord injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
After traumatic brain injury (TBI), monocyte/macrophage infiltration is a key early step in the development of an inflammatory cascade that leads to substantial secondary damage. Intravenous (IV) immunomodulatory nanoparticle (IMP) administration after TBI limits inflammatory cell infiltration and reduces both behavioral decline and lesion size without any noticeable toxicity. Here we show that there is a dose-response relationship between the amount of IMP administered and tissue damage which plateaus at a well-tolerated dose. There is a therapeutic window of efficacy for IMP administration of at least 6 h after injury with some benefit observed when treatment was delayed for 12 h after injury. Single cell RNA sequencing demonstrated substantial changes in gene expression after TBI in both neural and non-neural cells in the brain, and IMP administration ameliorated many of the changes. Particularly notable were significant unexpected changes in CCR1, CXCR2, and BDNF expression in vascular smooth muscle cells that may participate in injury responses after TBI. Thus, IMP treatment within 6 h after TBI limits inflammatory responses and gliosis, improves anatomical and behavioral outcomes and prevents detrimental changes in gene expression in both neural and non-neural cellular elements of the brain. IMPs are non-toxic and are made of an FDA-approved material that is stable at room temperature. They could easily be given IV immediately after TBI in the field by emergency medical technicians or in the emergency room to prevent secondary damage, thereby improving outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.