Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39569620›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

Microbiome-Based Colon Cancer Patient Stratification and Survival Analysis.

Joshua Smyth, Julien Godet, Anisa Choudhary, Anubrata Das, Georgios V Gkoutos, Animesh Acharjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Defining reference values for the gut microbiota in a Southern European population.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joshua SmythCollege of Medical and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Julien GodetFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Anisa ChoudharyCollege of Medical and Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Birmingham, UK.
Anubrata DasCollege of Medical and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Georgios V GkoutosCollege of Medical and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Animesh AcharjeeCollege of Medical and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2735-7010

Funding

MRC Heath Data Research HDRUK/CFC/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is any cancer that starts in the colon or the rectum and presents a significant health concern. It is the third most diagnosed and the second deadliest cancer, with an estimated 153,020 new cases and 52,550 deaths in 2023. The severity of colon cancer may be attributed to its ability to avoid the host immune system and growth suppressors, its asymptomatic nature in the early stages, its association with a continually ageing population and unfavourable diet and obesity. The composition of the gut microbiome plays an important role in the development of CRC and presents as an important target in early detection and in predicting treatment outcomes in CRC. This study aims to identify microbiome-specific derived clusters in CRC patients and conduct subsequent survival analysis using the specific microbiome features within clusters.

methodsConsensus clustering and feature selection, involving a Kruskal-Wallis test, a random forest and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were applied resulting in the identification of differently expressed microbiomes between clusters. Lastly, survival analysis was performed on the selected features using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression. K-means clustering, as selected using consensus clustering interpretation, presented three distinct clusters with clear differences in alpha and beta diversity and baseline clinical variables.

resultsA total 1311 of the 1406 microbes were selected using the Kruskal Wallis and passed to the random forest and LASSO, which narrowed the dataset to 140 features. Following the survival analysis, eight microbiome species, namely N4likevirus, Ambidensovirus, Synechococcus, Thermithiobacillus, Hydrocarboniphaga, Rhodovibrio, Gloeobacter and Candidatus Nitrosotenuis, were selected as significant in clustering and survival.

conclusionThis study reveals the heterogeneity of the CRC microbiome and its effect on disease prognosis and necessitates further exploration of the biological mechanisms of these selected microbiomes as well further investigation of whether the approach depicted here is applicable to other cancer types.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAgedCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival Analysisclusteringmachine learningmicrobiomepersonalised medicinesurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID39569620
PMCPMC11579663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.