ArticleSleep2025
Talking to sleepwalkers? Response to communication efforts in disorders of arousals.
Article in Sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anesthetic State-Dependent Bidirectional Control of States of Consciousness via Heterogeneous Medial Septum to Ventral Tegmental Area Circuits under Sevoflurane in Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Self-Reported Precipitating and Priming Factors for Somnambulism in Adult Sleepwalkers.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
- The Future of Parasomnias.Journal of sleep research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesDisorders of arousal (DoA) are diagnosed on the basis of clinical criteria, including inappropriate or absent responsiveness to communication attempts. Surprisingly, the ability of patients to interact with others during DoA episodes has not been systematically investigated. To address this gap, we conducted three studies.
methodsFirst, we used a retrospective questionnaire to assess verbal responsiveness during episodes in 61 adult patients with DoA (Study 1). Second, we used auditory stimulation during polysomnographically verified N3 sleep to trigger DoA episodes in 14 patients. We then asked questions to test the possibility of verbal interactions during the episodes (Study 2). Third, we assessed the presence and quality of conversations with a bed partner in 364 home video-recorded episodes from 19 patients (Study 3).
resultsIn Study 1, most patients (81%) reported occasional conversations during parasomnia episodes. Patients' ongoing mental content influenced both their responses to questions during episodes and their perception of the outside world (including their surroundings and the identity of their interlocutor ). In Study 2, auditory stimulation had a limited effect in inducing episodes (7/157 trials). One patient indirectly responded to our verbal prompts in a DoA episode. In Study 3, we found 37 video instances of discussion between patients and their partner.
conclusionsOverall, our findings suggest that DoA episodes are not a uniform state but may instead encompass varying states of consciousness, characterized by different levels of responsiveness and a complex interplay between internal and external information processing. These results highlight the limitations of current diagnostic criteria for DoA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.