ArticleInternational journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society2025
International practice patterns and perspectives on endovascular therapy for the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis.
Article in International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment in symptomatic pediatric cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Cerebral venous thrombosis: Current management, recent advances and future directions.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025Review
- Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Selected Persisting Areas of Uncertainty.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) accounts for 0.5-1% of all strokes. The role of endovascular therapy (EVT) in the management of CVT remains controversial and variations in practice patterns are not well known.
aimsHere, we present a comprehensive, international characterization of practice patterns and perspectives on the use of EVT for CVT.
methodsA comprehensive 42-question survey was distributed to stroke clinicians globally from May to October 2023, asking about practice patterns and perspectives on the use of EVT for CVT.
resultsThe overall response rate was 31% (863 respondents of 2744 invited) across 61 countries. The majority of respondents (74%) supported the use of EVT for CVT in certain clinical situations. Key considerations for decision-making in using EVT favored clinical over radiographic/procedural factors and included worsening level of consciousness (86%) and worsening neurological deficits (76%). In the past 3 years, 56% of respondents used EVT for the treatment of CVT, with most (49.5%) involved in two to five cases. Among interventionalists, significant variability existed in the techniques used for EVT (
conclusionOur survey reveals significant heterogeneity in approaches to EVT for CVT, and provides a comprehensive characterization of indications, techniques, and long-term management used by clinicians internationally. This resource will aid in optimizing patient selection and endovascular treatments for future trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.