Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39569523›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2024

Community sports leaders' perceptions of the risks and benefits of gambling sponsorship in community sport.

Simone McCarthy, Hannah Pitt, Melanie Randle, Grace Arnot, Sarah Marko, Mike Daube, Samantha L Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simone McCarthyFaculty of Health, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2671-3511
Hannah PittFaculty of Health, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4259-6186
Melanie RandleFaculty of Business and Law, School of Business, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Grace ArnotFaculty of Health, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5646-6366
Sarah MarkoFaculty of Health, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Mike DaubeFaculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Samantha L ThomasFaculty of Health, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1427-7775

Funding

ARC Discovery DP210101983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gambling sponsorship of professional sport, particularly relating to online wagering, has been a key focus of global regulatory reform efforts to address the normalization of gambling. In Australia, gambling companies and venues (including community clubs and hotels) also sponsor and develop relationships with community (non-professional) sports teams and clubs. In-depth interviews (n = 24) were conducted with senior leaders in community sporting organizations in Australia with an aim of understanding the factors that shape decisions about accepting or refusing gambling sponsorships and partnerships. A reflexive approach to thematic analysis was used to construct three themes from the data. First, participants considered the alignment of values between the sponsor and the community sporting organization. While most stated that gambling and sport should not be aligned through sponsorship, some forms of sponsorship (for example from community clubs) were perceived as less harmful than others (such as online wagering). Second, some thought that while there were ethical ways to engage with gambling sponsors such as not promoting sponsors' products, they were concerned about how gambling sponsorship might have an overall impact on the community. Third, was the impact of gambling sponsorships on the organization's reputation, and balancing this with a need for financial stability. Decisions to accept (or reject) gambling sponsorship were influenced by a range of perceived risks and benefits. Addressing the acceptance of gambling sponsorships among community sporting organizations could involve several approaches to interventions, including regulation, formal policies to guide sponsorship decisions and education about the risks of accepting these sponsorships.

Indexed as

GamblingSportsAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLeadershipMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRisk Assessmentcommercial determinants of healthgamblingsponsorshipsport

Identifiers

PMID39569523
PMCPMC11579608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.