ArticleHealth promotion international2024
Resisting industry narratives: guidance to avoid tobacco and nicotine industry framing.
Article in Health promotion international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stop calling it self-medication: Tobacco smoking is not medicine.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Article
- Investigation of Differences in Tobacco Use Language Between Groups: Corpus-Assisted Analysis.JMIR infodemiology · 2026Article
- From awareness to action: building monitoring capacity for tobacco and nicotine industry interference-experience from the JA PreventNCD project.European journal of public health · 2026Article
- Availability, appeal, and addictiveness by design: Tobacco and nicotine industry deliberate targeting of youth.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Engagement of Indigenous peoples in commercial tobacco reform strategies: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- An analysis of submissions on regulations to implement Aotearoa New Zealand's tobacco endgame policies.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- Colonial harm in new packaging: Indigenous critiques of the tobacco industry's 'harm reduction' rhetoric.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- Fanning the flame: analysing the emergence, implications, and challenges of Australia's de facto war on Nicotine.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tobacco and nicotine industry has a long history of endangering the health and wellbeing of individuals, populations and society, including Indigenous peoples, via dubious practices and tactics that continue today. These tactics include generating opposition, fracturing consensus, dehumanizing groups and minimizing the perception of harms from tobacco use. This article offers guidance for people working in health promotion and tobacco control to align with the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which includes Articles on research, monitoring and information exchange regarding the tobacco and nicotine industry. Recommendations are given to resist the tobacco and nicotine industry's narrative in health promotion, research, evaluation and publications. Holding the industry to account provides a further step forward to eliminating tobacco disease and death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.