Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39569481›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2024

Tobacco industry narratives of e-cigarette use in the UK: a qualitative framing analysis.

Ellie Harrison, Mark Petticrew, Rose Burns, May C I van Schalkwyk, Benjamin Hawkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ellie HarrisonLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-7515-4129
Mark PetticrewLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6378-5517
Rose BurnsLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4135-2403
May C I van SchalkwykLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2210-2289
Benjamin HawkinsUniversity of Cambridge, Trinity Lane, CB2 1TN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7027-8046

Funding

Cancer Research UKCharities: British Heart FoundationEconomic and Social Research CouncilEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilGovernment: Scottish Government Chief Scientist OfficeHCRW_Medical Research CouncilNational Institute of Health ResearchNatural Environment Research CouncilPublic Health AgencySPECTRUMUK Prevention Research PartnershipUKRI Research CouncilsWellcome and The Health Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health actors have expressed concerns over the entry of the tobacco industry into the UK e-cigarette market. It is important to be aware of the tobacco industry's involvement and stated aims for e-cigarettes in the UK, given their historical attempts to divert attention from and escape responsibility for the harms caused by combustible cigarettes. The use of e-cigarettes amongst young people in the UK has remained constant, despite the law prohibiting sales to adolescents and claims by manufacturers and others that they are designed solely as a tool to quit smoking. This study sought to examine how tobacco-related organizations in the UK e-cigarette market frame the use of e-cigarettes. Publicly available materials between September 2015 and June 2023 were collected from four transnational tobacco companies which have invested in the e-cigarette category, and from a UK e-cigarette trade association. A qualitative framing analysis of materials was conducted guided by relevant frameworks from the Commercial Determinants of Health literature. The analysis identified seven framings used by tobacco-related organizations relevant to e-cigarette usage in the UK. These were: co-opting of harm reduction; consumer choice; following the 'evidence'; insufficient evidence; the right kind of regulation; 'us' and 'them' rhetoric and marketing and advertising. By highlighting tobacco-related organizations' e-cigarette framings and contradictions, this study raises awareness of the rhetorical strategies used by the industry which aim to relegitimize tobacco companies in the political and public spheres.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco IndustryAdvertisingHarm ReductionHumansMarketingQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomVapingCommercial Determinants of Healthe-cigaretteshealth framingpublic policytobacco industryUKvaping

Identifiers

PMID39569481
PMCPMC11579614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.