Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39569428›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026

DySurv: dynamic deep learning model for survival analysis with conditional variational inference.

Munib Mesinovic, Peter Watkinson, Tingting Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Munib MesinovicDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3757-7877
Peter WatkinsonCritical Care Research Group, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7JX, United Kingdom.
Tingting ZhuDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, United Kingdom.

Funding

Rhodes Trust EP/S02428X/1Rhodes Trust and the EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Health Data Science EP/S02428X/1Royal Academy of Engineering under the Research Fellowship scheme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMachine learning applications for longitudinal electronic health records often forecast the risk of events at fixed time points, whereas survival analysis achieves dynamic risk prediction by estimating time-to-event distributions. Here, we propose a novel conditional variational autoencoder-based method, DySurv, which uses a combination of static and longitudinal measurements from electronic health records to estimate the individual risk of death dynamically. MATERIALS AND

methodsDySurv directly estimates the cumulative risk incidence function without making any parametric assumptions on the underlying stochastic process of the time-to-event. We evaluate DySurv on 6 time-to-event benchmark datasets in healthcare, as well as 2 real-world intensive care unit (ICU) electronic health records (EHR) datasets extracted from the eICU Collaborative Research (eICU) and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care database (MIMIC-IV).

resultsDySurv outperforms other existing statistical and deep learning approaches to time-to-event analysis across concordance and other metrics. It achieves time-dependent concordance of over 60% in the eICU case. It is also over 12% more accurate and 22% more sensitive than in-use ICU scores like Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. The predictive capacity of DySurv is consistent and the survival estimates remain disentangled across different datasets. DISCUSSION: Our interdisciplinary framework successfully incorporates deep learning, survival analysis, and intensive care to create a novel method for time-to-event prediction from longitudinal health records. We test our method on several held-out test sets from a variety of healthcare datasets and compare it to existing in-use clinical risk scoring benchmarks.

conclusionWhile our method leverages non-parametric extensions to deep learning-guided estimations of the survival distribution, further deep learning paradigms could be explored.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectronic Health RecordsHumansIntensive Care UnitsRisk AssessmentSurvival Analysisdeep learninghealthcarepersonalized medicineprognosticationsurvival analysisvariational autoencoders

Identifiers

PMID39569428
PMCPMC12758469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.