ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024
Effect of Acetabular Labral Tear Orientation on Hip Joint Kinematics: A Comparison of Radial Tears, Chondrolabral Junction Tears and Complex Tears in Cadaveric Hips.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acetabular labral tear morphology or orientation may influence hip stability. Hypothesis: A radial tear of the acetabular labrum would result in greater rotational and translational motion compared with a chondrolabral separation. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Included were 12 unpaired nonarthritic hip specimens, none of which had capsular laxity (8 male; mean age, 34.5 years). The specimens were stripped of all soft tissue except the hip capsule and labrum and, then potted using a custom jig. In 6 specimens, a 1-cm anterosuperior separation of the labrum from the acetabular rim (chondrolabral junction tear; CLJT) was created. In the other 6 specimens, a radial tear was created at the anterosuperior acetabulum. Subsequently, a complex labral tear was created in all specimens by adding a radial tear to the CLJT specimens and vice versa. The specimens were mounted on a load frame, and the femoral head displacement in the neutral and hyperextended positions was recorded at 5 N·m of internal/external rotation (IR/ER) torque and at 50 N of superior-inferior (S-I), anterior-posterior (A-P), and medial-lateral (M-L) force. Testing occurred at 0° extension and at maximal extension both before and after initial labral tear creation and again after creation of the complex labral tear. Before testing (intact state), the joint was vented to remove the effect of intra-articular pressure difference between the intact capsule and after capsulotomy for labral tear creation. The Results: Neither the radial labral injury nor the CLJT produced differences from the vented state in any combination of hip position or plane of motion. The complex labral tear showed increased IR/ER rotation at maximal hip extension. There was no difference between CLJT and radial labral tear in any combination of hip position or plane of motion. Conclusion: A simple labral tear did not affect hip joint stability when the capsule was intact, and no capsular laxity was present. A complex labral tear caused increased rotational laxity at maximal extension. Capsular laxity or a complex labral tear may be a prerequisite for labral injury to cause increased hip joint motion and/or translation. Clinical Relevance: Study findings suggest that labral tears in the absence of capsular laxity may not play a role in producing microinstability by increasing motion or translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.