Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39569384›Full record

ReviewInterventional cardiology (London, England)2024

British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Training Culture Focus Group Position Statement: Bringing Trainees and Trainers Together.

Thomas R Gilpin, Holly Morgan, Christian Fielder Camm, Alexandra Moss, James Cotton, Raghav T Bhatia, Dan McKenzie, Rasha Al-Lamee, Simon Ray, Nick Curzen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Interventional cardiology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thomas R GilpinCoronary Research Group, University Hospital Southampton UK.
Holly MorganFaculty of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kings College London UK.
Christian Fielder CammKeeble College, University of Oxford UK.
Alexandra MossHeart and Lung Centre, New Cross Hospital Wolverhampton, UK.
James CottonHeart and Lung Centre, New Cross Hospital Wolverhampton, UK.
Raghav T BhatiaHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Hull, UK.
Dan McKenzieCardiology Department, Royal United Hospital Bath, UK.
Rasha Al-LameeNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London London, UK.
Simon RayCardiology, Manchester University Hospitals Manchester, UK.
Nick CurzenCoronary Research Group, University Hospital Southampton UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unprofessional behaviour within cardiology has been well documented and commonly occurs within the cardiac catheterisation laboratory, with higher rates in interventional subspecialities. While most trainees have positive experiences and encounters within the catheterisation laboratory, around one in five report experiencing bullying. This not only has a significant negative impact on the individuals directly involved, but also on the wider multidisciplinary team; importantly, it will have a deleterious effect on patient safety. The British Cardiovascular Intervention Society established the Training Culture Focus Group in 2022 to analyse and offer potential solutions to this pressing issue. We recommend that a cohesive approach between trainers and trainees is the most effective way to reduce unprofessional behaviour incidents, thus improving departmental workplace culture and a subsequent reduction in adverse patient safety events.

Indexed as

bullying in the workplacecardiac catheterisation laboratoryCardiology training cultureinterventional cardiologypatient safety

Identifiers

PMID39569384
PMCPMC11577867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.