ReviewCureus2024
Efficacy and Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Intra-articular Injections in Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate for Hip Disorders: A Narrative Review of Biological Rationale, Clinical Evidence, and Research Priorities.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Platelet Rich Plasma Combined with Arthroscopic Surgery Versus Arthroscopic Surgery Alone for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in Reproductive Medicine: A Critical Review of PRP Therapy in Low-Reserve and Premature Ovarian Insufficiency.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- 3D-printed hip prostheses with regenerative integration: a state-of-the-art comprehensive review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent condition causing significant pain and disability. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intra-articular injections have emerged as a potential therapeutic option, but their efficacy is still debatable and their safety profile remains under-explored compared to standard treatments. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRP injections in patients with hip OA by analyzing data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and the Virtual Health Library (VHL) until October 31, 2022, adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included if they were RCTs assessing PRP injections for hip OA and reporting adverse events. Data extraction and methodological quality assessment were performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2 tool). Out of 188 identified studies, five met the inclusion criteria. The studies varied in sample size (43-111 patients) and PRP preparation methods (closed vs. open systems). All studies demonstrated significant pain reduction and functional improvement with PRP. No major adverse events were reported, indicating a favorable safety profile. Minor side effects were transient and resolved without further intervention. Methodological quality ranged from low to high risk of bias. In conclusion, PRP injections appear to be a safe and effective treatment option for managing hip OA, with favorable outcomes compared to hyaluronic acid. Further research is necessary to standardize PRP protocols and assess long-term safety and efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.