ArticleCureus2024
Does Screen Time Do More Damage in Boys Than Girls?
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Screen time and autism like behavior: Cross-sectional study from Georgia.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Screen exposure before age two and developmental outcomes in early childhood: a national cross-sectional study in China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Extracurricular activities as a moderator of the association between screen time and executive functions in children.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Does early screentime exposure or duration affect M-CHAT-R autism screening tool score?BMC pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Impact of Screen Time on Language Development and Vocabulary Acquisition in Early Childhood: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Gaming, religiosity and mental health among Georgian students.Discover mental health · 2025Article
- Digital screen time and speech-language delay in children: A cross-sectional study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Technological progress, particularly accelerated by the recent pandemic, has led to the digitalization of many aspects of daily life. Consequently, children are increasingly exposed to screen time, raising concerns about its potential impact on early development. Methods Four separate questionnaires were developed for different age groups (12-18 months, 19-30 months, 31-48 months, and 49-72 months). Data were collected over a two-month period from three major pediatric facilities, and social media platforms were also utilized to reach participants. The total sample size consisted of 5,137 children. Results Exposure to active screen time was found to increase the risk of expressive language delay, with a significant correlation identified between early screen time exposure and expressive language delay. In the 12-18 months age group, the OR was 1.52 (p = 0.008, χ²(1) = 7.08, p = 0.008), while in the 19-30 months age group, the OR was 1.79 (p = 0.0002; χ²(1) = 14.30, p < 0.001). Conclusions This study provides significant insights into the complex relationship between screen time exposure and expressive language development in young children. Our findings reveal that early screen time exposure is associated with a higher risk of expressive language delay. The data suggest that children aged 12-30 months are especially vulnerable. However, we cannot definitively state that the amount of average daily screen time is significantly changing the outcome. Conversely, we also found that a lack of screen time exposure may be associated with an increased risk of language delay in children aged 31-48 months, highlighting the nuanced role of screen time in child development. Parental supervision is a critical factor; however, our study indicates that higher levels of supervision do not consistently mitigate the risks associated with screen time across all age groups. Further research is warranted to explore the underlying factors contributing to the observed differences in susceptibility to expressive language delay among genders and to examine the long-term impacts of early screen exposure. By understanding these dynamics, we can better support children's developmental needs in an increasingly screen-saturated environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.