ReviewCureus2024
Utilizing Blockchain Technology for Healthcare and Biomedical Research: A Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A DeSci-Driven Blockchain Framework for AI-Augmented Healthcare Research.Blockchain in healthcare today · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blockchain is a decentralized, secure, and immutable public ledger that offers significant benefits over conventional centralized systems by preventing data breaches and cyber-attacks. It has a great potential to improve data security, privacy, and interoperability in healthcare and biomedical research. This review discusses the basic principles and the historical evolution of blockchain and evaluates the implications of blockchain for the existing healthcare infrastructure. It also highlights blockchain technology's advantages in electronic health records, supply chain management, clinical trials, and telemedicine. However, this technology faces several hurdles, including regulatory issues, technical complexity, and economic costs, which suggest a gradual adoption over time. In addition, the review emphasizes its ability to ensure data integrity, enhance collaboration, and protect intellectual property in biomedical research. This review shows that blockchain can enhance healthcare data management by providing secure, efficient, and patient-centric solutions. Furthermore, it also discusses the implications of blockchain for the future of healthcare and biomedical research and suggests that ongoing research and interdisciplinary approaches are essential for overcoming current barriers and realizing the full potential of this technology. Future research should focus on developing privacy-preserving hybrid data storage solutions that comply with international laws and regulations, thus enhancing the sustainability and scalability of this technology in healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.