ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating the Sealing Performance of Endodontic Sealers: Insights Into Achieving Complete Sealing.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Surface Modification of Gutta-Percha for the Use of Intact MTA as a Root Canal Sealer.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Comparison of Apical Sealing Ability of Different Endodontic Sealers - AnJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Quality of Single-Cone Obturation Using Different Sizes of Matching Gutta-Percha Points of Two Reciprocating Single-File Systems in Curved and Straight Root Canals.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The importance of achieving optimal sealing in endodontic procedures cannot be overstated, as it directly influences the success and durability of root canal treatments. The objective of this research was to measure and identify the sealing ability of endodontic sealers by evaluating their adhesion to root canal dentin and the extent to which they achieve a complete seal. Methods A total of 60 extracted lower premolar teeth were randomly divided into three groups of 20 samples each. After root canal preparation with Neo Endo Flex files, each group was treated with a different sealer: calcium silicate-based (Bio-C Sealer), epoxy resin-based (Seal Pex), and silicone-based (Roeko Gutta Flow 2). The sealers were applied using the single cone obturation technique with gutta-percha points. The samples were stored at 37°C and 100% humidity for one week. Finally, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally and analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to assess marginal adaptation. Results The largest gaps were found in group III (Roeko Gutta Flow 2) (86.2 µm coronal, 91.1 µm apical) and the smallest in group I (Bio-C Sealer) (52.5 µm coronal, 53.7 µm apical). Significant differences were confirmed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests, with group I having the best adaptation and group III the poorest. Under SEM, the coronal halves in every group outperformed the apical halves in terms of adaptability. Conclusion The study found that coronal halves adapted better than apical halves, and Bio-C Sealer performed better than Seal Pex and Roeko Gutta Flow 2. These findings indicate that Bio-C Sealer may improve sealing and decrease microleakage risk in endodontic procedures. This study needs further research and evaluation of the long-term effects of Bio-C Sealer in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.