Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39569234›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Flu-Phobia: Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy in a Rural Primary Care Setting.

Samantha M Lavertue, Richard Terry, Rachael Muggleton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samantha M LavertueFamily and Community Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Elmira, USA.
Richard TerryFamily Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Elmira, USA.
Rachael MuggletonFamily and Community Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Elmira, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sentiments expressed by individuals, such as "I do not trust vaccines," "I do not believe in vaccines," and "I do not want a shot," are commonly encountered by physicians during the annual influenza season. This study investigates vaccine hesitancy regarding the influenza vaccine within a rural primary care setting in New York State. Observations of subjective comments from community members prompted an inquiry into whether the contentious discourse surrounding the COVID-19 vaccine has influenced patients' decisions about the influenza vaccination. We hypothesized that over 50% of patients would decline the influenza vaccine during the 2023-2024 season and that many would attribute their refusal to the controversies associated with the COVID-19 vaccine. The findings of the study revealed that while more than 50% of surveyed patients did indeed refuse the influenza vaccine, only a minority linked their decision to the COVID-19 vaccine controversy. This paper examines the attitudes of a rural community toward the influenza vaccine and proposes potential strategies to address future vaccination disparities.

Indexed as

covid-19influenzainfluenza vaccinerural primary carevaccinationvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID39569234
PMCPMC11578388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.