Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39569214›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Intercostal Neuralgia Successfully Managed With Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.

David M Gallacher, Paul Gastelum, Sungkook A Park

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David M GallacherPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado, Aurora, USA.
Paul GastelumPain Management, Desert Orthopaedic Center, Las Vegas, USA.
Sungkook A ParkPain Management, Desert Orthopaedic Center, Las Vegas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intercostal neuralgia is characterized by neuropathic pain along the distribution of the intercostal nerve, which can cause debilitating pain and interfere with daily activities. The literature is extremely limited in assessing the use of neuromodulation to treat trauma-induced intercostal neuralgia. This case reports a 40-year-old patient who presented with decades of refractory, long-standing thoracic pain. The pain ranged from a four out of 10 to a nine out of 10 on the numeric rating scale (NRS). The patient failed pharmacologic therapy, physical therapy, chiropractic care, injection therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and spinal cord stimulation (SCS). The patient underwent a 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) trial, which temporarily relieved the pain until it was explanted. The patient subsequently underwent placement of a permanent PNS implant, which provided between 80-100% daily pain relief at a six-month follow-up. At the two-year follow-up, the patient continued to experience sustained pain relief, had weaned from opioid medications, and returned to all desired daily activities. This case suggests that minimally invasive PNS can effectively manage pain for patients with intercostal neuralgia who fail conservative measures. Further, to our knowledge, this two-year follow-up is the longest-reported outcome in the literature for using PNS for intercostal neuralgia after traumatic injury.

Indexed as

chronic paincomplex regional pain syndromecrpsintercostal neuralgianeuromodulationpain managementpain medicineperipheral nerve stimulationpns

Identifiers

PMID39569214
PMCPMC11576495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.