ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Refrigerated amniotic membrane maintains its therapeutic qualities for 48 hours.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During wound healing, the migration of keratinocytes is critical for wound closure. The application of amniotic membrane (AM) on wounds with challenging contexts (e.g., chronification and diabetic foot ulcer) has proven very successful. However, the use of AM for clinical practice has several restraints when applied to patients; the most important restriction is preserving AM's therapeutic properties between its thawing and application onto the patient's wound. Moreover, AM collection and processing requires a cleanroom, together with specialized staff and equipment, and facilities that are not usually available in many hospitals and healthcare units. In this publication, we kept previously cryopreserved AM at different temperatures (37°C, 20°C, and 4°C) in different media (DMEM high glucose and saline solution with or without human albumin) and for long incubation time periods after thawing (24 h and 48 h). HaCaT keratinocytes and TGF-β1-chronified HaCaT keratinocytes were used to measure several parameters related to wound healing: migration, cell cycle arrest rescue, and the expression of key genes and migration-related proteins. Our findings indicate that AM kept in physiological saline solution at 4°C for 24 h or 48 h performed excellently in promoting HaCaT cell migration compared to AM that had been immediately thawed (0 h). Indeed, key proteins, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and c-Jun, were induced by AM at 4°C in saline solution. Similarly, cell proliferation and different genes related to survival, inflammation, and senescence had, in all cases, the same response as to standard AM. These data suggest that the handling method in saline solution at 4°C does not interfere with AM's therapeutic properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.