ArticleACS catalysis2024
Role of Interfacial Hydrogen in Ethylene Hydrogenation on Graphite-Supported Ag, Au, and Cu Catalysts.
Article in ACS catalysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A combined surface science/microreactor approach was applied to examine interface effects in ethylene hydrogenation on carbon-supported Ag, Au, and Cu nanoparticle catalysts. Turnover frequencies (TOFs) were substantially higher for supported catalysts than for (unsupported) polycrystalline metal foils, especially for Ag. Spark ablation of the corresponding metals on highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) and carbon-coated grids yielded nanoparticles of around 3 nm size that were well-suited for characterization by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), high-resolution (scanning) transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM/STEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). Polycrystalline metal foils characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), EDX, electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), XPS, and low-energy ion scattering (LEIS) served as unsupported references. Employing a UHV-compatible flow microreactor and gas chromatography (GC) allowed us to determine the catalytic performance of the model catalysts in ethylene hydrogenation up to 200 °C under atmospheric pressure. Compared to the pure metal foils, the HOPG-supported metal nanoparticles exhibited not only strongly increased activity but also higher stability (slower deactivation) and differing reaction orders. For the most active Ag catalysts, DFT calculations were carried out to determine the adsorption energies of the reacting species on single-crystal surfaces as well as on carbon-supported and unsupported Ag nanoparticles. Adsorption of molecular hydrogen was very weak on all unsupported Ag surfaces, resulting in hydrocarbon-"poisoned" surfaces. However, when a carbon support was present, the adsorption strength of H
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.