Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39569155›Full record

ReviewACS catalysis2024

Practical Considerations for Understanding Surface Reaction Mechanisms Involved in Heterogeneous Catalysis.

Daniyal Kiani, Israel E Wachs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS catalysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Leveraging Large Language Models for Understanding Fundamental Principles of Catalysis.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Inverse Ni/CeCrOInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Triple composite based on metal-organic framework: differences in production of reactive oxygen species in biological and non-biological media.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biomedical Applications of Nanozymes: An Enzymology Perspective.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniyal KianiRenewable Resources and Enabling Sciences Center, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9748-3007
Israel E WachsDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5282-128X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acquiring useful knowledge about the active site(s) of a catalyst, nature of reactant-catalyst interactions, nature of reactive intermediates, rate-determining step, reaction rate orders that affect various process parameters, and reaction mechanism as a whole is exceedingly challenging. This is especially true in the case of heterogeneous catalysts due to the complexity of the nature of surface active sites and their nonstatic behavior. Here, we present our perspective on differentiating between various surface reaction mechanisms in light of pioneering studies by leaders in the field, with the aim of clarifying some of the confusion associated with these complex mechanisms, especially the Eley-Rideal mechanism. Using bibliometric analysis, we identify and discuss the following four reactions that most commonly invoke the Eley-Rideal mechanism: H

Identifiers

PMID39569155
PMCPMC11574757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.