ArticleRSC advances2024
Discrimination of mongoose hair from domestic cattle hair, human hair, and synthetic fiber using FTIR spectroscopy and chemometric analysis: a rapid, cost-effective, and field-deployable tool for wildlife forensics.
Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-Analytical Characterization of the Earthen Plaster and Ground Layer from the Nirvana Platform in Cave No. 47 of the Kizil Grottoes, Xinjiang, China.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mongoose hair is used to prepare fine brushes, which increases the demand for mongooses to be poached from the wild and brutally bludgeoned to death. Mongooses were listed as Schedule I species under the Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act 1972. Species identification of wildlife case-related samples is necessary to convict a person under this legislation. Microscopy and DNA-based techniques are commonly used to identify mongoose hair in seized brushes. However, in painting brushes, the roots, and the lower part of the hair are mostly trimmed, and only the upper part is used to make the brushes. In addition, brushes are often prepared with mixed hair from mongoose, domestic cattle, human hair, and synthetic fibre. Therefore, the identification of mongoose hair by microscopy and DNA-based techniques is restricted due to the lack of complete strands of hair and the absence of hair roots. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop an alternative methodology for the identification of mongoose hair from seized articles. FTIR spectroscopy for forensic analysis has gained significant attention over the years because of its sensitivity, specificity, and non-destructive nature. The present study aimed to discriminate Indian grey mongoose (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.