ReviewRSC advances2024
Revolutionizing environmental cleanup: the evolution of MOFs as catalysts for pollution remediation.
Review in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA-Based Environmental Remediation: Functional Principles, Material Platforms, and Future Perspectives.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) and Their Derivatives for Environmental Remediation and Energy Devices.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Analytical evaluation of an Ag-MOF photocatalyst for efficient malachite green degradation in wastewater: kinetics, mechanism, and stability.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Article
- HarnessingRSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global problem of ecological safety and public health necessitates, the development of new sustainable ideas for pollution remediation. In recent development, metal-organic frameworks (MOF) are the emerging technology with remarkable potential, which have been employed in environmental remediation. MOFs are networks that are created by the coordination of metals or polyanions with ligands and contain organic components that can be customized. The interesting features of MOFs are a large surface area, tuneable porosity, functional diversity, and high predictability of pollutant adsorption, catalysis, and degradation. It is a solid material that occupies a unique position in the war against environmental pollutants. One of the main benefits of MOFs is that they exhibit selective adsorption of a wide range of pollutants, including heavy metals, organics, greenhouse gases, water and soil. Only particles with the right combination of pore size and chemical composition will achieve this selectivity, derived from the high level of specificity. Besides, they possess high catalytic ability for the removal of pollutants by means of different methods such as photocatalysis, Fenton-like reactions, and oxidative degradation. By generating mobile active sites within the framework of MOFs, we can not only ensure high affinity for pollutants but also effective transformation of toxic chemicals into less harmful or even inert end products. However, the long-term stability of MOFs is becoming more important as eco-friendly parts are replaced with those that can be used repeatedly, and systems based on MOFs that can remove pollutants in more than one way are fabricated. MOFs can reduce waste production, energy consumption as compared to the other removal process. With its endless capacities, MOF technology brings a solution to the environmental cleansing problem, working as a flexible problem solver from one field to another. The investigation of MOF synthesis and principles will allow researchers to fully understand the potential of MOFs in environmental problem solving, making the world a better place for all of us.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.