Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39569040›Full record

ArticleNPJ climate and atmospheric science2024

Hybrid physics-AI outperforms numerical weather prediction for extreme precipitation nowcasting.

Puja Das, August Posch, Nathan Barber, Michael Hicks, Kate Duffy, Thomas Vandal, Debjani Singh, Katie van Werkhoven, Auroop R Ganguly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ climate and atmospheric science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Puja DasSustainability and Data Sciences Laboratory, Northeastern University, Boston, MA USA.ORCID 0009-0002-4287-8025
August PoschSustainability and Data Sciences Laboratory, Northeastern University, Boston, MA USA.
Nathan BarberTennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, TN USA.
Michael HicksTennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, TN USA.
Kate DuffyZeus AI, Cambridge, MA USA.
Thomas VandalZeus AI, Cambridge, MA USA.
Debjani SinghEnvironmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN USA.
Katie van WerkhovenResearch Triangle Institute, Raleigh, NC USA.
Auroop R GangulySustainability and Data Sciences Laboratory, Northeastern University, Boston, MA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precipitation nowcasting, which is critical for flood emergency and river management, has remained challenging for decades, although recent developments in deep generative modeling (DGM) suggest the possibility of improvements. River management centers, such as the Tennessee Valley Authority, have been using Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models for nowcasting, but they have been struggling with missed detections even from best-in-class NWP models. While decades of prior research achieved limited improvements beyond advection and localized evolution, recent attempts have shown progress from so-called physics-free machine learning (ML) methods, and even greater improvements from physics-embedded ML approaches. Developers of DGM for nowcasting have compared their approaches with optical flow (a variant of advection) and meteorologists' judgment, but not with NWP models. Further, they have not conducted independent co-evaluations with water resources and river managers. Here we show that the state-of-the-art physics-embedded deep generative model, specifically NowcastNet, outperforms the High Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) model, which is the latest generation of NWP, along with advection and persistence, especially for heavy precipitation events. Thus, for grid-cell extremes over 16 mm/h, NowcastNet demonstrated a median critical success index (CSI) of 0.30, compared with median CSI of 0.04 for HRRR. However, despite hydrologically-relevant improvements in point-by-point forecasts from NowcastNet, caveats include overestimation of spatially aggregate precipitation over longer lead times. Our co-evaluation with ML developers, hydrologists and river managers suggest the possibility of improved flood emergency response and hydropower management.

Indexed as

Climate sciencesHydrology

Identifiers

PMID39569040
PMCPMC11573709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.