ArticleJB & JS open access
Reoperation Rate After Posterior Spinal Fusion Varies Significantly by Lenke Type.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early postoperative serum metal profiles and subsequent revision-related surgery after instrumented fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lenke curve types can vary in their response to treatment. We explored potential differences in reoperation rates, causes, and risk factors among patients with different Lenke types who underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: We studied a multicenter database of patients with AIS who underwent index PSF at ≤21 years of age and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Baseline and surgical characteristics were collected. Reoperation rates, causes, and risk factors were analyzed by Lenke type. Results: A total of 3,165 patients were included. The mean age was 14.6 years, and most patients were female (81%) and Caucasian (68%). The mean follow-up period was 4.4 years. A total of 138 patients (4.4%) underwent reoperation. The reoperation rate varied by Lenke type (p = 0.02): patients with type-5 curves had the highest reoperation rate (7.2%), and those with type-1 curves had the lowest (3.0%). The most common cause of reoperation was an instrumentation complication. The rate of reoperation due to an instrumentation complication varied by Lenke type (p < 0.01). Compared with patients with type-1 curves, those with type-5 curves had significantly higher rates of reoperation due to implant prominence (odds ratio [OR], 11.7; p = 0.03), loss of fixation (OR, 3.9; p = 0.01), or a broken rod (OR, 7.8; p = 0.02) and those with type-3 curves had a significantly higher rate of reoperation due to loss of fixation (OR, 4.37; p = 0.01). Independent risk factors for reoperation were a major curve magnitude of ≥60° in patients with type-5 curves (adjusted OR [aOR], 4.18; p = 0.04), a major curve correction of ≥40° in patients with type-5 curves (aOR, 3.6; p = 0.04), and a lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) at or above L1 in patients with type-1 curves (aOR, 2.8; p = 0.02). Conclusions: The reoperation rate for patients with AIS who underwent PSF varied by Lenke type. Patients with type-5 curves had the highest reoperation rate, whereas patients with type-1 curves had the lowest. Patients with Lenke type-5 curves had a higher rate of reoperation due to instrumentation complications. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.