ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2024
Gestational Diabetes and Analysis of Maternal and Fetal Outcomes Among Pregnant Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing a Risk Stratification Tool to Predict Patients with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus at Risk of Insulin Treatment: A Cohort Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose of the Study: To determine the occurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus and analyze the maternal and fetal outcomes among pregnant women. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted for a duration of 7 months in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics at tertiary care hospital where 518 pregnant women participants of age above 18 years who had come for labor and undergone DIPSI (diabetes in pregnancy study of India) test were included in the study after the ethical clearance and obtaining written informed consent, whereas pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes mellitus and on other medication that alter glucose metabolism were excluded from the study. Results: The occurrence of GDM was found to be 15.44%. The majority of GDM patients (53.75%) were able to manage their condition through dietary modifications alone. Metformin was required for 36.25% of the subjects, while 10% needed insulin. The rates of cesarean delivery (72.1%) and postpartum hemorrhage (17.5%) were also higher in the GDM group compared to the non-GDM group ( Conclusions: GDM is a frequently observed complication among pregnant women which can lead to adverse maternal and fetal outcomes as well as several complications such as cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, pre-eclampsia, polyhydramnios, UTI and vaginal candidiasis as compared to those without GDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.