ReviewHeliyon2024
Advancing pathogen and tumor copy number variation detection through simultaneous metagenomic next-generation sequencing: A comprehensive review.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal characterisation of spontaneous Merkel cell carcinoma in the endangered Caucasian squirrelJournal of veterinary research · 2026Article
- Metagenomic next-generation sequencing facilitates precision treatment and prognostic improvement in pulmonary cryptococcosis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Solving the diagnostic dilemma in bone infections: metagenomic next generation sequencing enhances pathogen identification accuracy.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical practice, timely and accurate diagnosis can effectively reduce unnecessary treatment, avoid high medical costs, and prevent adverse prognoses. However, some patients with malignant tumors and those with infection often exhibit similar symptoms, which are difficult to distinguish, posing challenges in accurate clinical diagnosis. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology has been widely applied to confirm the source of infection. Recent studies have shown that for pathogen detection, mNGS technology can be used to perform chromosomal copy number variations (CNVs) analysis in two different analytical pipelines using the same wet test. mNGS technology has further demonstrated its utility in not only the determination of pathogenic microorganisms but also of CNVs, thereby facilitating early differential diagnosis for malignant tumors. In this review, we aim to analyze the diagnostic performance of mNGS technology in the simultaneous detection of pathogenic microorganisms and CNVs in current clinical practice and discuss the advantages and limitations of mNGS-CNV dual-omics detection technology. Our review highlights the need for more large-scale prospective research data on current mNGS-CNV dual-omics detection technology to provide more evidence-based results for researchers and clinicians and to promote the greater role of this technology in future clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.