ArticleHeliyon2024
Reducing drought vulnerability of forest soils using Xanthan gum-based soil conditioners.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of Flame and Thermal Degradation Behavior of Xanthan- and Gelatin-Based Composites Used as Topsoil Covers in Forestry.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Reducing drought vulnerability of forest soils using Xanthan gum-based soil conditioners.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate change increases the frequency and severity of droughts in many parts of Europe, thereby affecting the availability of water resources. Therefore, preserving the soil water content is essential for maintaining forest diversity and plant vitality. To improve soil hydraulic properties and reduce drought vulnerability, three xanthan-gum-based soil conditioners (SC_R, SC_CG, and SC_ZZC) were developed under the European ONEforest project. These soil conditioners (SCs), including oxide ash and cellulose fibres of different lengths, differ in their filler properties. This study evaluated the performance of these soil conditioners in forest soils in Slovenia (S1), Spain (S2), and Germany (S3). Water absorption, water retention, hydraulic conductivity, seed germination, and plant growth in the untreated soils and mixtures were analysed. The results showed a 53 %-100 % increase in water absorption with high dosage of SCs (1.7 % of dry SC per dry soil mass). The addition of SCs also significantly improved the water retention capacity of the treated soils within a suction range of 0-100 kPa, which is advantageous for maintaining adequate water availability for plant growth. The effect of SCs on unsaturated hydraulic conductivity varies depending on the soil type. For example, at a similar suction, the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of mixtures with soils S2 and S3 can be more than an order of magnitude lower than that of untreated soils S2 and S3. In contrast, mixtures with soil S1 showed unsaturated hydraulic conductivity similar to that of the untreated soil. In the seeding experiment, plants in treated soils survived for up to 8 d without watering compared to those in untreated soils, with survival linked to the initial water content of the mixtures. These findings suggest that soil conditioners reduce drought vulnerability by improving water retention and regulating water loss. However, the optimal dosage should be adjusted according to different soil types and local environmental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.