ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2024
Optimizing thyroid AUS nodules malignancy prediction: a comprehensive study of logistic regression and machine learning models.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of emerging RNA markers in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology samples: advancements and challenges.Endocrine · 2025Pooled it
- Construction and validation of a multicenter predictive model for neonatal hypoglycemia risk in infants of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis risk in papillary thyroid carcinoma based on multiple model comparisons.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- External Validation of a Predictive Model for Thyroid Cancer Risk with Decision Curve Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prediction of malignancy risk in Bethesda III nodules: development and validation of multiple machine learning models.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The accurate diagnosis of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology, particularly in the atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) category, remains challenging. This study aims to predict the risk of malignancy in AUS nodules by comparing two machine learning (ML) and three conventional logistic regression (LR) models. Methods: A retrospective study on 356 AUS nodules in 342 individuals from 6728 patients who underwent thyroid surgery in 2021. All the clinical, ultrasonographic, and molecular data were collected and randomly separated into training and validation cohorts at a ratio of 7: 3. ML (random forest and XGBoost) and LR (lasso regression, best subset selection, and backward stepwise regression) models were constructed and evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), calibration, and clinical utility metrics. Results: Approximately 90% (321/356) of the AUS nodules were malignant, predominantly papillary thyroid carcinoma with 68.6% BRAF V600E mutations. The final LR prediction model based on backward stepwise regression exhibited superior discrimination with AUC values of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73-0.92) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.67-0.94) in training and validation, respectively. Well calibration, and clinical utility were also confirmed. The ML models showed moderate performance. A nomogram was developed on the final LR model. Conclusions: The LR model developed using the backward stepwise regression, outperformed ML models in predicting malignancy in AUS thyroid nodules. The corresponding nomogram based on this model provides a valuable and practical tool for personalized risk assessment, potentially reducing unnecessary surgeries and enhancing clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.