Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39568752›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Successful treatment of refractory palmoplantar pustulosis by upadacitinib: report of 28 patients.

Na Du, Jingyi Yang, Yiwen Zhang, Xinyan Lv, Lei Cao, Wei Min

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Palmoplantar pustulosis: pathogenesis, differential diagnosis, and treatment.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Successful treatment of palmoplantar pustulosis with topical ruxolitinib.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Na DuDepartment of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jingyi YangDepartment of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yiwen ZhangDepartment of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xinyan LvDepartment of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Lei Cao *Jiangsu Institute of Clinical Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Wei Min *Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Upadacitinib, a specific JAK1 inhibitor, has minimal effect on other JAK subtypes. It influences the inflammatory process in various ways. Upadacitinib has been approved for conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, atopic dermatitis, and ulcerative colitis in various countries. The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with refractory palmoplantar pustulosis who have not responded to conventional treatments (e.g., Acitretin, Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F, cyclosporine, methotrexate). Methods: We conducted a retrospective collection of clinical data from 28 patients who received upadacitinib treatment at the Department of Dermatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University, from July 2022 to December 2023. We evaluated the Palmoplantar Pustulosis Area and Severity Index (PPPASI) scores, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) scores before and after treatment. We also recorded any adverse events during the treatment process. Results: A total of 28 patients were diagnosed with PPP, including 10 males and 18 females, and 8 patients (3 males and 5 females) were diagnosed with SAPHO syndrome. The mean age was (36.3 ± 10.5) years. After 12 weeks of treatment, PPPASI scores decreased from baseline (13.86 ± 2.76) to (5.56 ± 1.08), with a statistically significant difference ( Conclusion: Upadacitinib could be an additional safe and effective treatment for treating refractory palmoplantar pustulosis with a potential benefit on patients' quality of life. Further studies are needed to assess its short-and long-term efficacy and safety in larger sample sizes in randomized double-blind controlled trials.

Indexed as

clinical efficacy and safetyJanus kinase 1-selective inhabitorpalmoplantar pustulosisrefractoryupadacitinib

Identifiers

PMID39568752
PMCPMC11576273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.