Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39568742›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Construction of a disease risk prediction model for postherpetic pruritus by machine learning.

Zheng Lin, Yuan Dou, Ru-Yi Ju, Ping Lin, Yi Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zheng LinDepartment of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yuan DouDepartment of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ru-Yi JuDepartment of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ping LinDepartment of Geriatrics, Hangzhou Third Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yi CaoDepartment of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postherpetic itch (PHI) is an easily overlooked complication of herpes zoster that greatly affects patients' quality of life. Studies have shown that early intervention can reduce the occurrence of itch. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model through a machine learning approach to identify patients at risk of developing PHI among patients with herpes zoster, making PHI prevention a viable clinical option. Method: We conducted a retrospective review of 488 hospitalized patients with herpes zoster at The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University and classified according to whether they had PHI. Fifty indicators of these participants were collected as potential input features for the model. Features associated with PHI were identified for inclusion in the model using the least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO). Divide all the data into five pieces, and then use each piece as a verification set and the others as a training set for training and verification, this process is repeated 100 times. Five models, logistic regression, random forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor, gradient boosting decision tree and neural network, were built in the training set using machine learning methods, and the performance of these models was evaluated in the test set. Results: Seven non-zero characteristic variables from the Lasso regression results were selected for inclusion in the model, including age, moderate pain, time to recovery from rash, diabetes, severe pain, rash on the head and face, and basophil ratio. The RF model performs better than other models. On the test set, the AUC of the RF model is 0.84 [(95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-0.88], an accuracy of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69-0.86), a precision of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.45-0.77), a recall of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58-0.89), and a specificity of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70-0.89). Conclusions: In this study, five machine learning methods were used to build postherpetic itch risk prediction models by analyzing historical case data, and the optimal model was selected through comparative analysis, with the random forest model being the top performing model.

Indexed as

chronic itchmachine learningpostherpetic itchprediction modelrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID39568742
PMCPMC11576279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.