ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Application of large language model combined with retrieval enhanced generation technology in digestive endoscopic nursing.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of large language models for emergency department triage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Outcomes, Evaluation Metrics, and Measurement Tools for Large Language Model Applications Research in Nursing: A Scoping Review.International nursing review · 2026Article
- Improving Large Language Model Applications in the Medical and Nursing Domains With Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated powerful capabilities in general domains, they may output information in the medical field that could be incorrect, incomplete, or fabricated. They are also unable to answer personalized questions related to departments or individual patient health. Retrieval-augmented generation technology (RAG) can introduce external knowledge bases and utilize the retrieved information to generate answers or text, thereby enhancing prediction accuracy. Method: We introduced internal departmental data and 17 commonly used gastroenterology guidelines as a knowledge base. Based on RAG, we developed the Endo-chat medical chat application, which can answer patient questions related to gastrointestinal endoscopy. We then included 200 patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy, randomly divided into two groups of 100 each, for a questionnaire survey. A comparative evaluation was conducted between the traditional manual methods and Endo-chat. Results: Compared to ChatGPT, Endo-chat can accurately and professionally answer relevant questions after matching the knowledge base. In terms of response efficiency, completeness, and patient satisfaction, Endo-chat outperformed manual methods significantly. There was no statistical difference in response accuracy between the two. Patients showed a preference for AI services and expressed support for the introduction of AI. All participating nurses in the survey believed that introducing AI could reduce nursing workload. Conclusion: In clinical practice, Endo-chat can be used as a highly effective auxiliary tool for digestive endoscopic care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.