Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39568739›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

Application of large language model combined with retrieval enhanced generation technology in digestive endoscopic nursing.

Zhaoli Fu, Siyuan Fu, Yuan Huang, Wenfang He, Zhuodan Zhong, Yan Guo, Yanfeng Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zhaoli Fu *Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guanzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Siyuan Fu *The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuan HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guanzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Wenfang HeDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guanzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Zhuodan ZhongDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guanzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yan GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guanzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yanfeng LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guanzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated powerful capabilities in general domains, they may output information in the medical field that could be incorrect, incomplete, or fabricated. They are also unable to answer personalized questions related to departments or individual patient health. Retrieval-augmented generation technology (RAG) can introduce external knowledge bases and utilize the retrieved information to generate answers or text, thereby enhancing prediction accuracy. Method: We introduced internal departmental data and 17 commonly used gastroenterology guidelines as a knowledge base. Based on RAG, we developed the Endo-chat medical chat application, which can answer patient questions related to gastrointestinal endoscopy. We then included 200 patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy, randomly divided into two groups of 100 each, for a questionnaire survey. A comparative evaluation was conducted between the traditional manual methods and Endo-chat. Results: Compared to ChatGPT, Endo-chat can accurately and professionally answer relevant questions after matching the knowledge base. In terms of response efficiency, completeness, and patient satisfaction, Endo-chat outperformed manual methods significantly. There was no statistical difference in response accuracy between the two. Patients showed a preference for AI services and expressed support for the introduction of AI. All participating nurses in the survey believed that introducing AI could reduce nursing workload. Conclusion: In clinical practice, Endo-chat can be used as a highly effective auxiliary tool for digestive endoscopic care.

Indexed as

ChatGPTdigestive endoscopic nursinglarge language modelquestionnaire survey scaleretrieval enhanced generation technology

Identifiers

PMID39568739
PMCPMC11577783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.