Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39568718›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2024

A multimodal

S Marceli Leano, Wanderson De Souza, Rodrigo De Vecchi, Amanda Lopes, Tatiana Deliberador, Jose M Granjeiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S Marceli Leano *Divisão de Metrologia em Biologia, Diretoria de Metrologia Científica, Industrial e Tecnologia, Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Tecnologia (INMETRO), Duque de Caxias-RJ, Brazil.
Wanderson De Souza *Divisão de Metrologia em Biologia, Diretoria de Metrologia Científica, Industrial e Tecnologia, Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Tecnologia (INMETRO), Duque de Caxias-RJ, Brazil.
Rodrigo De VecchiEpiskin, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil.
Amanda LopesInstituto Latino Americano de Pesquisa e Ensino Odontológico-ILAPEO, Curitiba-PR, Brazil.
Tatiana DeliberadorInstituto Latino Americano de Pesquisa e Ensino Odontológico-ILAPEO, Curitiba-PR, Brazil.
Jose M GranjeiroDivisão de Metrologia em Biologia, Diretoria de Metrologia Científica, Industrial e Tecnologia, Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Tecnologia (INMETRO), Duque de Caxias-RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Periodontitis, affecting approximately 3.9 billion individuals globally, significantly impacts quality of life and has raised interest in its potential systemic effects. Sodium perborate, a common component in oral care products for biofilm control, is widely used, though concerns about its safety persist. This study aimed to evaluate the Methods: Experiments were performed in both 2D monolayer and 3D cultures using MTT and electrical impedance assays, adhering to the manufacturer's recommended exposure time of 30-60 s for product testing. For the reconstructed epidermis model, a prolonged exposure time of 42 min was applied, following the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Test Guideline 439. Results: Results indicated that all products and sodium perborate at 1 mg/mL were cytotoxic in monolayer cultures. However, at concentrations relevant to commercial formulations (0.06 mg/mL sodium perborate), no significant toxicity was observed. In contrast, the 3D culture models, including spheroids and reconstructed epidermis, exhibited minimal to no cytotoxic effects for the commercial products, with sodium perborate showing no significant toxicity below 0.1 mg/mL. The reconstructed epidermis model, used as surrogate for oral mucosa, further confirmed that the products were non-irritating, in compliance with OECD TG 439 standards. Discussion: This study highlights the importance of considering exposure time, dosage, and cellular model when assessing the safety of oral care products. While 2D models are useful for preliminary screenings, 3D models provide a more physiologically relevant assessment, emphasizing the need for robust testing protocols to ensure product safety.

Indexed as

monolayeroral care productsreconstructed human epidermis (RhE)sodium perboratethree-dimensional culturetoxicity

Identifiers

PMID39568718
PMCPMC11576945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.