Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39568682›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024

Surgical Capacity Assessment and Leverage in the Palestinian Land (SCALPEL-I) Study: The First Nationwide Plastic Surgery Capacity Evaluation in Palestine.

Osaid Alser, Laith Ayasa, Mohammed Alhabil, Shahd Idais, Ayah Almzayyen, Majdeddin MohammedAli, Reem Younes, Heba Alghoul, Muath Alser, Bryce Stash and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Osaid AlserFrom the Faculty of Medicine, Islamic Univeristy of Gaza, Gaza, Occupied Palestinian Territory.
Laith AyasaFaculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Occupied Palestinian Territory.
Mohammed AlhabilFaculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University-Al-Azhar Branch, Gaza, Occupied Palestinian Territory.
Shahd IdaisFaculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Occupied Palestinian Territory.
Ayah AlmzayyenFaculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University-Al-Azhar Branch, Gaza, Occupied Palestinian Territory.
Majdeddin MohammedAliDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Occupied Palestinian Territory.
Reem YounesFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Heba AlghoulDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX.
Muath AlserKasralainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Bryce StashDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX.
Roba KhundkarDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Timothy GoodacreDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Amanda GosmanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
Andrea PusicDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Deepak BharadiaDepartment of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Access to surgical care in low-to-middle-income countries (LMICs), especially in war-torn areas such as the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt), is a global health priority. The plastic surgical capacity in the oPt has not been evaluated. This study provides the first systematic evaluation of plastic surgical capacity in the oPt. Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted between December 2022 and February 2023 included facilities providing plastic surgery services in the oPt, except private centers run by nonsurgeons. A modified PIPES (personnel, infrastructure, procedures, equipment, and supplies) tool was used. Data were analyzed for geographic and private/public disparities. Results: Eleven facilities were included; 6 (54.5%) were in the West Bank and 5 (45.5%) in Gaza. The majority were private hospitals (n = 6, 54.5%). The mean PIPES score was personnel = 4.3 (4.03), infrastructure = 18.4 (2.4), procedures = 9.8 (3.8), equipment = 19.2 (3.6), and supplies = 22.4 (1.9). Hospital beds, operating rooms, and plastic surgeons per 100,000 people were 33.5, 1.0, and 0.5, respectively. There were 8 board-certified plastic surgeons. No facilities had a plastic surgery residency program. Key deficiencies included: 8 facilities (72.2%) not performing microsurgical free tissue transfers (none in Gaza), 5 (45.5%) lacking a system to identify complications, and 7 (63.3%) not offering regular educational courses. Average power supply was 8.0 hours/day in Gaza and 24.0 hours/day in the West Bank. Conclusions: Plastic surgical capacity in the oPt shows significant deficiencies, especially in Gaza. These findings should inform stakeholders to address disparities, develop training programs, and improve access to safe plastic surgery.

Identifiers

PMID39568682
PMCPMC11578215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.