ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Decoding the Impact of AI on Microsurgery: Systematic Review and Classification of Six Subdomains for Future Development.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced microsurgical training: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in microsurgery and supermicrosurgery training within plastic surgery: A systematic review.JPRAS open · 2025Review
- The Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Breaking Bones, Breaking Barriers: ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Gemini in Hand Fracture Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) in microsurgery has tremendous potential in plastic and reconstructive surgery, with possibilities to elevate surgical precision, planning, and patient outcomes. This systematic review seeks to summarize available studies on the implementation of AI in microsurgery and classify these into subdomains where AI can revolutionize our field. Methods: Adhering to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a meticulous search strategy was used across multiple databases. The inclusion criteria encompassed articles that explicitly discussed AI's integration in microsurgical practices. Our aim was to analyze and classify these studies across subdomains for future development. Results: The search yielded 2377 articles, with 571 abstracts eligible for screening. After shortlisting and reviewing 86 full-text articles, 29 studies met inclusion criteria. Detailed analysis led to the classification of 6 subdomains within AI applications in microsurgery, including information and knowledge delivery, microsurgical skills training, preoperative planning, intraoperative navigational aids and automated surgical tool control, flap monitoring, and postoperative predictive analytics for patient outcomes. Each subtheme showcased the multifaceted impact of AI on enhancing microsurgical procedures, from preoperative planning to postoperative recovery. Conclusions: The integration of AI into microsurgery signals a new dawn of surgical innovation, albeit with the caution warranted by its nascent stage and application diversity. The authors present a systematic review and 6 clear subdomains across which AI will likely play a role within microsurgery. Continuous research, ethical diligence, and cross-disciplinary cooperation is necessary for its successful integration within our specialty.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.