ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2024
A privacy-preserving approach for cloud-based protein fold recognition.
Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mamba-fusion for privacy-preserving disease prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A privacy-preserving approach for cloud-based protein fold recognition.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complexity and cost of training machine learning models have made cloud-based machine learning as a service (MLaaS) attractive for businesses and researchers. MLaaS eliminates the need for in-house expertise by providing pre-built models and infrastructure. However, it raises data privacy and model security concerns, especially in medical fields like protein fold recognition. We propose a secure three-party computation-based MLaaS solution for privacy-preserving protein fold recognition, protecting both sequence and model privacy. Our efficient private building blocks enable complex operations privately, including addition, multiplication, multiplexer with a different methodology, most-significant bit, modulus conversion, and exact exponential operations. We demonstrate our privacy-preserving recurrent kernel network (RKN) solution, showing that it matches the performance of non-private models. Our scalability analysis indicates linear scalability with RKN parameters, making it viable for real-world deployment. This solution holds promise for converting other medical domain machine learning algorithms to privacy-preserving MLaaS using our building blocks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.