ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024
Research-Oriented Hospitals in China: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis Based CiteSpace.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction, operations, and sustainability of maternal and child health pharmacy clinics in China: a national multicenter cross-sectional survey.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward oral frailty management among nursing staff and its determinant factors: a multicentre cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Digital empowerment for refined surgical privileging management: a model construction and empirical study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The therapeutic effects of various tonic traditional Chinese medicines on demyelinating diseases.Metabolic brain disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research-oriented hospitals represent the primary direction for the future development of large-scale, high-level hospitals in China. Research-oriented hospitals, increasingly highlighted in domestic policies, lacks a comprehensive analysis of existing research outcomes. Bibliometric evaluates scientific research endeavors and trends in disciplines by statistically analyzing literature data. Citespace is a widely used bibliometric software that helps researchers visualize research hotspots and trends in a specific field by measuring and modeling literature data from that area. This study employs CiteSpace software to conduct a bibliometric analysis and visualization analysis of the literature in the field of research-oriented hospitals, spanning publications from 2003 to 2023 and sourced from databases including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and Weipu (VIP). Findings indicate rapid publication growth from 2010 to 2016, followed by fluctuations characterized by alternating declines and increases. In terms of the distribution of authors and institutions, the study observes a relatively modest level of collaboration among highly productive researchers and research institutions, suggesting room for enhanced interdisciplinary and institutional partnerships. Moreover, research hotspots in the field of research-oriented hospitals can be categorized into hospital development strategy, hospital management, and technological innovation. Considering the limitations of current research and the evolution of social needs, this study suggests that future research should focus more on clarifying the essence of research-oriented hospitals, developing targeted development strategies, and addressing the numerous obstacles faced during the hospital innovation process. In conclusion, this bibliometric analysis provides a snapshot of the current research status and trend. The insights gained from this research not only aim to inform future studies but also to inspire relevant stakeholders such as policy makers, hospital managers, and scholars to strengthen practical actions, enhance the construction and operation of research-oriented hospitals, thereby improving healthcare outcomes for populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.