ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Formulation-dependent differences in paclitaxel distribution to anatomical sites relevant to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of sNfL as a Biomarker for Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity Through an Integrated PKPD Model.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Article
- Recent paclitaxel formulation strategies: expanding the therapeutic index by addressing biopharmaceutical and toxicity limitations.Archives of pharmacal research · 2026Review
- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Review
- Strain-dependent neuronal disposition and toxicity of paclitaxel in mice.ASPET discovery · 2025Article
- Alpha-lipoic acid ameliorates nab-paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy by inhibiting IL-17 signaling pathway.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose-limiting adverse event observed in patients receiving paclitaxel, associated with initial pathological changes in the peripheral nervous system, i.e., distal nerves and dorsal root ganglia (DRG). The prevalence of CIPN in patients receiving paclitaxel formulated i) in polyethylated castor oil with ethanol (CreEL-PTX), ii) as albumin-bound (nab-PTX), and iii) in XR17 micelles (micellar-PTX), is unexpectedly varying. We hypothesize that the discrepancy in CIPN prevalence could be governed by differences in the extent of paclitaxel distribution across blood-to-tissue barriers at the CIPN-sites, caused by the specific formulation. Methods: The recently developed Combinatory Mapping Approach for CIPN was used to determine the unbound tissue-to-plasma concentration ratio K Results: Based on our data, the Cremophor-free paclitaxel formulations were associated with a higher distribution of paclitaxel to CIPN-sites than CreEL-PTX, e.g., K Discussion: In the case of similar unbound paclitaxel concentration in the plasma of patients and assumed species-independent extent of paclitaxel transport across the barriers, nab- and micellar-PTX formulations can lead to higher paclitaxel exposure at CIPN-sites in comparison to CreEL-PTX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.