ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Efficacy of disitamab vedotin in non-small cell lung cancer with
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolving treatment strategies for HER2-altered non-small-cell lung cancer: the rise of TKIs and ADCs.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Clinical applications of antibody-drug conjugates in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Advances in Computational Drug Repurposing, Driver Genes, and Therapeutics in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Engineered nanocarriers for targeted lung cancer therapy: mechanistic innovations and recent clinical progress.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( Methods: This study conducted a retrospective review of patients harboring Results: Out of 22 patients, 21 (95.5%) received RC48 combination therapy, while one received RC48 monotherapy. The ORR of all patients reached 45.5%, and the DCR stood at 90.9%. The median PFS (mPFS) was 7.5 months. Among patients receiving RC48 combination therapy, the ORR was 47.7%, and the mPFS of 8.1 months. The combination of RC48 with platinum+/- bevacizumab resulted in the highest ORR of 71.4% (5 out of 7 patients), with Conclusion: RC48, particularly in combination regimens, demonstrates promising efficacy in advanced NSCLC with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.