ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024
Brachytherapy for cervical cancer: from intracavitary to interstitial technique.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Impact of the locking function of hybrid inverse planning optimization on the treatment plan quality of intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- A Novel Three-Dimension Printed Individualized Curved-Needle-Based Interstitial Brachytherapy for Re-Irradiation in Uterine Fundus-Involving Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Case Report.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Brachytherapy use in cervical cancer: a narrative review.Gynecology and pelvic medicine · 2026Review
- Precision brachytherapy for bulky cervical tumors: Clinical implementation of a 3D-printed template and curved needle system.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2025Article
- Research trends in cervical cancer brachytherapy: a bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is a common malignant tumor of female reproductive system. Radiation therapy is one of the main methods of cervical cancer treatment, of which brachytherapy is an essential and important part of radiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. With the rapid development of imaging technologies such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), brachytherapy for cervical cancer has gradually developed from traditional two-dimensional image-guided technology to three-dimensional image-guided technology. And there are more and more treatment methods, including intracavitary brachytherapy, interstitial brachytherapy, and intracavitary combined interstitial implantation brachytherapy. We performed a PubMed search for introduce the application progress of intracavity, implantation, intracavity combined implantation brachytherapy and radioactive seed implantation, and discuss the dosimetric feasibility of internal and external fusion irradiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.